Jurassic Park III

Audience Reviews

View More

Benjamin W. @Code70 6h An incredibly flawed but entertaining threequel. Overall, I don’t think this movie works. The story isn’t very good, the main parents aren’t compelling at all, and this movie was just so hindered by production and the amount of time they had. But, this is some enjoyment to be had, and there’s something to be said about it not feeling as corporate-driven or overly slick like the newer entries. See more Mitchell S @Mitchstur 1d It's not as well made as the original, but it's still edge of your seat scary. Especially with the Spinosaurus. See more Kyle H. @Kylebh2015 Jan 25 I loved the spinosaurus not as good as the first one though See more Enrique R @EnriqueRamosLovesMovies Jan 18 Jurassic Park III, an absolute blockbuster mess. Listen, the cinematography is fine, the dinosaurs look like action figures made from Kenner. The movie really isn’t about dinosaurs until like 1 hour later on the film. Steven Spielberg was supposed to direct this film, but he said that the first two Jurassic Park films doesn’t need a third one. But, later on 2001, he changed his mind and instead of directing it, he produced it. I really don’t William H. Macy in this. Still, you know, Sam Neill does good as Dr. Alan Grant and Tea Léoni as Amanda Kirby. The plot doesn’t even make sense. Anyways, I give Jurassic Park III a 4.7/10 or a 2.9/5 stars. See more Romas M @Romas Jan 7 Greetings from Lithuania. "Jurassic Park III" (2001) has to be one of the most shortest running blockbusters i have ever seen. While it was fun movie overall, i couldn't believe my eyes when the credits started to roll - nevertheless at running time 1 h 22 min. it delivered what it promised, sort of. Parts III was always in my opinion weakest in the trilogy and it didn't add anything new to the series. It felt like they did run out of ideas for the third film. Pacing of this movie is kind mixed bag - at short running time it still manages to drag. It lacked the "WOW" sense that was in a first movie, but still it was a pretty fun adventure film yet felt like a small spin off. Overall, "Jurassic Park III" isn't really anything to remember except that it featured Sam Neill again and he was the best part of the film. It had good special effects (for a year 2001), some new dinosaurs and was overall fun adventure but it felt like a side quest. See more Cristi222yt C @Cristi222yt Jan 7 This is my favourite movie out of the entire franchise. See more Read all reviews

Jurassic Park III

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now