Rumble Fish

Audience Reviews

View More

Isaiah Y @zayman2 Feb 27 Underrated film by Francis Ford Coppola See more thiago s @Thiagostone Sep 1 Filme fraco, o roteiro é fraco, as cenas são fracas, a história é fraca, o elenco é fraco, e ninguém ajuda a melhorar o filme, os personagens são fracos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes, para fazer o filme ser bom See more Emily H. @Hollis.26 Jul 4 This movie didn’t catch my attention. It was kind of boring but did love the black and white vibe. I also loved Matt Dillon and Diane lane being together. Any movie they’re in together is automatically better. See more Kaleigh M @RT22849124 Jun 2 Thought this was gonna be better than it was, I was disappointed in it as it wasn't really like it was in the book. I love you matt dillon but this movie SUCKED HARD DICK. Half of the time I don't even know what was going on. The shots weren't bad nor the black and white wasn't a bad idea. See more Stephen C @bob25009 May 27 1 hour and 34 minutes of drama, based on the novel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! See more Mason M @RT73597940 04/19/2025 Rumble Fish could easily be labeled as cryptic or pretentious, but an experienced director like Francis Ford Coppola brings this film plenty of life. This picture was one of Coppola's most beautiful efforts visually, full of stunning smoke filled black and white imagery that brings out both the beautiful and the ugly in the everyday world. This film was also very interesting emotionally, making a melancholic atmosphere that could've been dry but was strangely emotional. And Matt Dillon gives a great performance as the main character who never exactly gets what's really going on. My only complaint about this film was that Stewart Copeland's score often sets the wrong tone for this dark and emotional film. But Coppola overall brings an emotional look on the confusion of being a teenager. See more Read all reviews

Rumble Fish

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING